In the field of nickel‑alloy welding, ERNiCrMo‑3 and ERNiCrMo‑4 are two of the most frequently used filler metal grades. Both fall under the AWS A5.14 specification for nickel‑chromium‑molybdenum alloys, sharing about 85% of their total alloy composition. Yet, it is the remaining 15%– the critical differences – that determine their entirely distinct areas of application.
This article provides a full‑spectrum comparison of ERNiCrMo-3 vs ERNiCrMo-4 welding wire, covering chemical composition, mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, high‑temperature behavior, typical applications, and welding procedures. It is designed to help engineers and technical professionals make accurate, cost‑effective selection decisions.
ERNiCrMo-3 vs ERNiCrMo-4 welding wire comparison starts from their base alloys.
ERNiCrMo-3 corresponds to the commercial grade Inconel 625. It is a nickel-chromium-molybdenum-niobium (Ni-Cr-Mo-Nb) alloy welding wire. The addition of niobium(Nb) is its hallmark, which provides solid-solution strengthening and precipitation hardening, significantly boosting the alloy’s strength and creep resistance.
ERNiCrMo-4 corresponds to Hastelloy C-276. It is a nickel-chromium-molybdenum-tungsten(Ni-Cr-Mo-W) alloy wire. The presence of tungsten(W) gives it superior resistance to localised corrosion in reducing environments.
Chemical composition is the fundamental basis for distinguishing ERNiCrMo-3 and ERNiCrMo-4 welding wire. The following table lists the key elements according to AWS standards:
| Element | ERNiCrMo-3 (Alloy 625) | ERNiCrMo-4 (C-276) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nickel (Ni) | 58.0% – 68.9% | 50.0% – 63.5% | Both are nickel-based |
| Chromium (Cr) | 20% – 23% | 14.5% – 16.5% | ERNiCrMo-3 has higher Cr – better oxidation resistance |
| Molybdenum (Mo) | 8.0% – 10% | 15% – 17% | ERNiCrMo-4 has nearly double Mo – superior in reducing acids |
| Niobium (Nb) | 3.2% – 4.2% | 0% | Unique to ERNiCrMo-3 – provides strengthening |
| Tungsten (W) | 0% | 3.0% – 4.5% | Unique to ERNiCrMo-4 – enhances localised corrosion resistance |
| Iron (Fe) | 0% – 5.0% | 4.0% – 7.0% | — |
| Carbon (C) | ≤ 0.010% | ≤ 0.020% | Both are low-carbon grades |
Key takeaway: The comparison table shows that ERNiCrMo-3 has higher "Cr + Nb", while ERNiCrMo-4 has much higher "Mo + W".
| Property | ERNiCrMo‑3 | ERNiCrMo‑4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile Strength (UTS) | ~870 MPa | ~790 MPa |
| Elongation | 34% | 28% |
| Modulus of Elasticity | 200 GPa | 220 GPa |
| Density | 8.6 g/cm³ | 9.0 g/cm³ |
| Liquidus Temperature | 1480°C | 1590°C |
| Solidus Temperature | 1430°C | 1530°C |
ERNiCrMo‑3 offers higher tensile strength and elongation, meaning the weld metal has greater strength and better ductility. ERNiCrMo‑4 has a significantly higher melting range (liquidus ~110°C higher), which gives it an edge in high‑temperature service applications.
This is where the two nickel alloy welding wires diverge most sharply.
In a nutshell: ERNiCrMo‑3 excels in oxidation resistance and all‑round corrosion protection; ERNiCrMo‑4 is the champion in reducing acids and extreme corrosive conditions.
Both wires exhibit excellent high‑temperature properties, but with different emphases:
| Application Field | ERNiCrMo‑3 | ERNiCrMo‑4 |
|---|---|---|
| Aerospace | Engine exhaust systems, combustion chambers | Limited use |
| Petrochemical | Heat exchangers, reactors, column tube bundles | Reactors, valves, piping systems |
| Marine Engineering | Desalination plants, offshore platforms | Offshore risers, equipment in salt‑spray environments |
| Power Generation | Gas turbine hot‑section components | Flue‑gas desulphurisation (FGD) units |
| Nuclear | Nuclear reactor components | Nuclear reactor components |
| Cryogenic | Welding 9% Ni steel | Welding 9% Ni steel (down to ‑196°C) |
| Dissimilar Metal Welding | Joining Ni alloys to stainless steel and carbon steel | Joining C‑276 to other Ni alloys and stainless steel |
| Surfacing / Cladding | Corrosion‑resistant overlay on steel | Corrosion‑resistant overlay on steel |
ERNiCrMo‑3 has a much broader application range, covering aerospace, oil & gas, metallurgy, and marine sectors. ERNiCrMo‑4 is more focused on extreme corrosion challenges, such as chemical processing, hydrometallurgy, and FGD systems.
Both ERNiCrMo‑3 and ERNiCrMo‑4 share many commonalities in welding practice:
Common aspects:
Differences:
How do you choose between these two wires in a real engineering project? Follow this framework:
Choosing the right filler metal is only half the battle, you also need the right diameter, packaging, and competitive pricing for your project scale.
Our team specialises in supplying high‑quality ERNiCrMo‑3 and ERNiCrMo‑4 welding wires that fully comply with AWS A5.14, ASME II, and ISO standards. We offer:
📧 Email us at support@ronsteel.com
📞 Call us at +86073182250427
🌐 Visit our website at https://www.ronscowire.com/ to request a quote or download the full data sheet.
Ronsco is a trusted global supplier of nickel alloy and stainless steel welding wires, including Inconel, Hastelloy, and Monel series. Our products are manufactured to meet industry standards and are widely used in demanding applications such as aerospace, oil & gas, chemical processing, and power generation. Explore our resource center for the latest industry insights, product knowledge, and technical references.
Contact us for a quote or technical assistance.


